In today’s post, I want to discuss the Relief for Cause OER. I will share common reasons they are given, the regulations concerning this type of OER, my thoughts, and the appeals process.
Let me preface by telling you that I hope you never receive this type of evaluation report, or have to write one for one of your subordinate officers. But, if you plan on making a career out of the Army, there’s a small chance one of these two situations might happen to you at some point. If either of these two events happen, it is in your best interest to EDUCATE yourself about the regulations and procedures concerning a Relief for Cause OER.
What is Relief for Cause?
According to AR 623-3, a “Relief for Cause” is defined as an early release of an officer from a specific duty or assignment directed by superior authority and based on a decision that the officer has failed in his or her performance of duty.” In layman’s terms, it’s the process of formally getting fired from your job.
Please note that this isn’t very common in the Army. Normally, you get a few “chances” to correct your behavior or performance. Or, you get a “less than stellar” evaluation report. During my 15-years of service, I only knew one person that received a “Relief for Cause” OER. And I met plenty of people who weren’t very good at their job or they got “informally” fired by being moved to a new duty position ahead of schedule.
Reasons for a Relief for Cause OER
In most cases, a Relief for Cause happens when a rater loses confidence in a subordinate’s ability to successfully perform their job due to misconduct, poor judgment, the subordinate’s inability to complete assigned duties, or for similar reasons. When this happens, the rater has the authority to formally relieve the subordinate officer.
Several examples might include:
- A death in a unit that could/should have been prevented
- Losing weapons or sensitive items
- Hazing
- Lying
- Stealing
- Sexual Harassment/EO violations
- Misconduct
Typically, the reason is determined by the rater or senior rater, but the request could come from a higher ranking officer outside of your unit.
Relief for Cause Regulation AR 623-3
I thought it would be beneficial to post what Army Regulation 623-3 says about the Relief for Cause process. I know the reading is a bit dry, but it is helpful.
“A code 05, “Relief for Cause” OER, is required when an officer is relieved for cause, regardless of the rating period involved (for example, information pertaining to a previous reporting period that did not come to light until a later rating period). “Relief for Cause” is defined as an early release of an officer from a specific duty or assignment directed by superior authority and based on a decision that the officer has failed in their performance of duty. In this regard, duty performance will consist of the completion of assigned tasks in a competent manner and compliance at all times with the accepted professional officer standards consisting of attributes and competencies as part of the Leadership Requirements Model (see ADP/ADRP 6–22). These standards will apply to conduct both on and off duty. The following are additional considerations for “Relief for Cause” OERs. AR 600–8–2 explains procedural requirements for a nontransferable flag for
“Relief for Cause” reports.
a. If, regardless of reason, the relief does not occur on the date the officer is removed from duty position responsibilities (that is, suspended), the period of time between the removal and the relief will be nonrated time included in the period of the “Relief for Cause” OER. The published rating chain at the time of the relief will render the “Relief for Cause” OER at the time of the relief; no other OER will be due on this officer during this nonrated period.
b. Cases where the rated officer has been suspended from duties pending an investigation will be resolved by the chain of command as expeditiously as possible to reduce the amount of potential nonrated time involved. Every effort will be made to retain the established rating chain, with the officer performing alternate duties under that rating chain until the investigation is resolved. If the rated officer is suspended and subsequently relieved, the period between the suspension and the relief is nonrated time. The suspended officer will not render evaluation reports or receive an OER until their status (and, thus, their ability to serve as a rating official) is decided (that is, if relieved the rated officer will not render reports as a rating official). While no OER will be rendered on a suspended officer during the period of suspension, for an officer who is suspended and subsequently returned to duty (not relieved), the period of suspension is recorded as evaluated time on the next OER.
c. If a relief for cause is contemplated on the basis of an informal AR 15–6 investigation, referral procedures contained in that regulation will be followed before the act of initiating or directing the relief. This is irrespective of the fact that the resultant OER will also be referred to the rated officer as described in paragraph 3–29. This does not preclude a temporary suspension from assigned duties pending application of the procedural safeguards contained in AR 15–6. Action to relieve an officer from any command position will not be taken until after obtaining written approval from the first general officer in the chain of command of the officer being relieved, as required by AR 600–20.
d. The “Relief for Cause” OER must specifically indicate who directed the relief of the rated officer. If the official directing relief is in the rating chain, that official will clearly explain the reason for the relief in their portion of the OER. If the relief is directed by someone outside the rating chain, the evaluation report will indicate who directed the relief in either the rater or senior rater narrative portion. See DA Pam 623–3 for instructions and procedural guidance that apply to completing a “Relief for Cause” report.
e. If the relief is directed by someone other than the rating officials, the official directing the relief will describe the reasons for the relief in an enclosure to the OER (see fig 3–2). See paras 2–15 through 2–18 for supplementary review requirements.
f. If, after a “Relief for Cause” report has been submitted to HQDA, rating officials become aware of additional significant information, the provisions of paragraphs 3–37, 3–38, and 3–39 will apply.
g. A rating official may relieve an officer because of information received about a previous reporting period. For example, a rating official who receives information from a completed investigation regarding a past incident plans to relieve the officer from their present position or process them for elimination. When this occurs, the following provisions apply:
(1) A “Relief for Cause” report will be prepared.
(2) The rated officer will be evaluated only on performance during the current rating period, with the exception of the statement clarifying the relief.
(3) Rating restrictions described in DA Pam 623–3 do not apply.
(4) The reason for the relief will be cited in the report.
(5) If necessary, the new information will be forwarded to the previous rating chain when submitting an addendum, as described in paragraphs 3–37, 3–38, and 3–39.
h. The minimum time requirements for rating officials do not apply. All rating officials will evaluate the rated Soldier; however, any rating official who has not directed the relief, and does not agree with the relief, may state nonconcurrence in the proper narrative portion of the “Relief for Cause” OER.”
My Recommendations
Before you initiate a Relief for Cause OER for one of your subordinate officers, here are a few things you should consider:
Sit down with the officer to hear their side of the story. There might be more to the situation than you know about.
Read AR 623-3 and DA PAM 623-3 to educate yourself on the process and regulations. Most of the “common” questions & answers are provided in those resources.
Wait two to three days until your emotions die down so you can make a logical decision about the issue. Is a formal Relief for Cause the best course of action, or is there another option you could pursue?
Consult with your Legal Team to find out your role, responsibility, and obligation. The JAG Office is a WEALTH of information. Make sure everything you plan on doing is within your legal boundaries.
Initiate a formal 15-6 Investigation, if applicable, to look into the matter (talk with JAG first). This is required before you formally publish the Relief for Cause OER.
Once you take these steps, you will be educated about the process and your courses of action. At this point, trust your gut decision.
The Appeal Process
You have the right to appeal the Relief for Cause OER, but the odds of overturning it are stacked against you. The best thing you can do is schedule a consultation with your S1 or local JAG Office. Find out what your rights are and educate yourself on the regulations covering the appeal process (see below). There are lots of different rules for the process, depending upon the rank of the officer.
You might also want to consider the time involved to appeal it, the evidence you have to back-up your opinion of the matter, how much longer you have in your career or military service obligation, and the advice you get from JAG or a civilian attorney.
Very few people overturn a Relief for Cause OER. It’s possible, but highly unlikely. In my opinion, receiving a Relief for Cause OER is pretty much a career ender. Yes, you can remain in the military (in most cases), but your opportunities for career advancement are marginal at best.
Final Thoughts
I’d like to close by saying the Relief for Cause OER is typically a “career ending” evaluation report for the rated officer. While it may be necessary at times, the rated officer should always do their due diligence and determine if there is another course of action that would remedy the situation. If nothing else, consult with JAG and put some serious thought into the matter before you choose this course of action.
If you have any questions I may be able to help you with on this complicated subject, just post them below in the comments section, and I will do my best to provide an answer. Thanks for your service. Hooah!
Suggested Reading
- Army OER Rater Bullets
- How to Write Army NCOERs
- How to Fast Track Your Military Career
- Military Career Tips
Chuck Holmes
Former Army Major (resigned)
Publisher, Part-Time-Commander.com
Email: mrchuckholmes@gmail.com
Suggested Resources
Our Books & Training Courses
Recommended Reading List
No one wants to give a Relief for Cause OER and no one wants to get them. But if you are a rater and you’ve done your job right, and you supervise someone who is incompetent, you should give them a bad OER. It’s up to you do to your job, do the counselings and give them a fair chance. But don’t just give them a marginal OER because you are scared to do a Relief for Cause OER. If you do that, you aren’t doing your job right.
Exactly. A lot of leaders are scared to “buck” the system. They pass people along because they don’t want to do the hard counseling or write a bad evaluation report for someone who honestly deserves it.
If more leaders did those two things, the Army would be much better at separating incompetent officers and giving more opportunities to other officers who actually deserve it.
A Relief For Cause OER seems like it is harsh, but not when viewing the causes behind an officer or soldier receiving one. A death in a unit that could have been prevented would be traumatizing in itself for the soldier, but there would have to be repercussions for the actions that cause it in the first place. With regards to losing weapons or sensitive items, that could be a cause for #1 as well because the weapons or sensitive items could be used against the unit. It seems people are cracking down on hazing across the country. From football teams to fraternities and sororities, bullying in the form of hazing is being eliminated and I couldn’t be happier to see it go.
It is harsh and should not be used as the first course of action in most cases. I do believe everyone messes up from time to time. It’s the gravity of those mistakes that ultimately warrant a Relief for Cause OER. Normal mistakes are normal. But deaths, losing sensitive items, hazing, EO, sexual harassment and many of the other factors that warrant a Relief for Cause OER should never be tolerated.
The Relief for Cause OER is certainly something I hope I never have to write or receive. It must be terrible to have to write a report ending someone’s career. It’s good to hear that it doesn’t happen very often, though – I’m sure officers use it only as a last resort, and explore all other options before writing one. As you say, it’s good to be educated, even about things you hope you’ll never come across!
It doesn’t happen very often at all, Andrew. During my 15 years in the military, I only saw one person get a Relief for Cause OER. I’ve seen lots of people get fired from a job, but in most cases they just get a marginal evaluation and get moved to another job. To get a Relief for Cause OER, you really have to mess up or piss off someone high up in the ranks.
Though I’ve never been in a situation where I witnessed or was otherwise involved in “Relief for Cause”, I have seen more than one soldier “informally” fired from a position. The examples you list are good, but of course there are so many more. Anything that could be considered “conduct unbecoming” of either an officer or an enlisted soldier can be used for cause in my experience.
Most people who get fired get “informally” fired. This happens because the supervisor didn’t document things properly or do their job right. The problem with “informally” firing people is that you still keep them eligible for upward promotion and advancement. That means they can move on to a higher, more important job, and mess more things up. That always drives me crazy. If someone is bad, they should be counseled, given a chance, and if the behavior continues, fired formally.
Chuck
The relief for cause OER or NCOER is absolutely a career-ender, so no, they should never be entered into lightly. We had some major issues with some personnel across the brigade during our first deployment–taking people out of a career National Guard environment and suddenly plunging them into an active duty combat deployment has a way of revealing the weak links–from platoon leaders and platoon sergeants to company commanders and first sergeants. All of the ones I know of were shunted into a place where they couldn’t do any harm–a first sergeant who just wasn’t taking care of his unit was laterally transferred to master sergeant and sent to work on the battalion staff, for example, and a poorly-performing platoon leader was similarly kicked over to an assistant staff position. The ones I knew weren’t bad guys; they were just in over their heads in the positions they held.
You’re right, spending time on Active Duty or Annual Training allows you to see people’s true colors, talents, and skills. In some cases, a Relief for Cause OER is necessary, but in many cases, you can just give the person a sub-par evaluation and move them to a different duty position.