National Training Center Observer Controller: My Experience

In 2001, while serving as a young Lieutenant at Fort Carson, Colorado, I received orders to report to the National Training Center as a “temporary” Observer Controller.  To the best of my recollection, I had to report to Fort Irwin for three weeks.  The first week was to get certified as an Observer Controller and the last two weeks were to do the job and evaluate my peer.

At the time I was still as Second Lieutenant and boy was I GREEN! I was a young Quartermaster Officer with no experience.  Even worse,  I looked at the assignment as PUNISHMENT.  At the time, I definitely did not feel honored to go.  I had a couple days to get ready for the assignment, and then I got on a plane to fly to California.

This was my first visit to the National Training Center, but definitely not my last.  I remember arriving at Fort Irwin for the first time.  It was in the middle of nowhere and it was DRY and HOT.  I definitely didn’t know what to expect or what to do.  I reported to my building, got keys to my living quarters and started my classroom instruction the following day.

The training class was very informative and helpful.  It taught me what my duties were and how I should go about doing them.

An Observer Controller is basically someone assigned with the task of evaluating a peer.  Normally, they are the same rank.  At the end of different events in the Field Training Exercise, the Observer Controller provides verbal and written feedback to their peer about what went well, what went wrong and what could be improved.  I like to think of it as a one-on-one After Action Review.

My job was to evaluate another Lieutenant.  Her job was to serve as the Support Operations Officer in her Forward Support Company.

During the time “in the box” I spent most of time driving around in my HMMWV and observing the training.  I took notes, observed what happened, and provided feedback.  It was a bit weird providing feedback, since I was so young an inexperienced myself, but I did do my best to be constructive, objective and honest.

I spent most nights sleeping in the desert, on the hood of my HMMWV!  By the time the rotation was finished, I had learned a lot.  I learned about NTC, how it works and what to expect.  I also learned a lot about what a Support Operations Officer should and shouldn’t do.  I learned how important Observer Controllers are.  I also learned the art of providing honest and objective feedback, while in a tactful manner.

Overall, the experience as an Observer Controller at the National Training Center was very eye opening and rewarding.  It definitely prepared my “mindset” for when I went with my unit to the National Training Center.  It gave me insights about what to do, what not to do and how to interact with my Observer Controller.

If you get the experience to be an Observer Controller, I would highly recommend it.  I believe it will give you a different perspective about leadership and tactics, and help you fine tune your craft.

What do you think?  If you’ve been to the National Training Center as an Observer Controller, I would love to hear about your experience.  Leave a comment below to share your thoughts.

If You Like Our Content, Please Share It:

5 thoughts on “National Training Center Observer Controller: My Experience”

  1. hi, Scorpion 18A Ancient Ancient here. Yes, from Korea DMZ to Irwin as an OC. terrible place to PCS an apprentice lieutenant, but what a smart terrible place to be early 90s before inet. good stuff, Ágo

  2. It’s great to see that you were able to take an assignment you viewed as punishment and turn it into a learning experience. Those really are some of the most valuable experiences we can have – going in with no expectations and coming out surprised with how much you gained. I’ve never been an observer controller in the military, but I have conducted peer evaluations and I find that by assessing others I am able to find my own strengths and weaknesses. By helping someone else better their performance, you can improve yours, too.

  3. A very interesting look into a job situation I wasn't as familiar with. I was particularly intrigued with two things.
    1. Having to evaluate someone of the same rank and similar experience. I haven't seen much of this, but it was a very interesting idea.
    2. Having what looks like a bad assignment and having it be both interesting and enlightening. Those are often the best assignments.

    1. Personally, I like the idea of peer evaluations. If you are open minded you can learn a lot from it. I’ve also found that many of the worst assignments (initially) turn out to be the best ones.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *