Article 126 UCMJ: Arson in the Military

Today, we are going to take a look at Article 126 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Many of us wonder why anyone in the military would ever face an Article 126, but it does, and has happened. Hopefully never to you or anyone you know because this is a major violation of the UCMJ.

What is an An Article 126 in the UCMJ?

The UCMJ is military law that applies to U.S. service members on Active-Duty, and in the Reserves and National Guard. Article 126 of the UCMJ covers arson, which is burning a dwelling or any other structure willfully and maliciously.

Arson is a crime of willfully and maliciously setting fire to or charring property. Though the act typically involves buildings, the term arson can also refer to the intentional burning of other things, such as motor vehicles, watercraft, or forests. ~ Wikipedia

The Key Is Willfully And Maliciously

There have been some cases where an accidental fire happened and a service member was charged with an Article 126. It is the responsibility of prosecutors to prove beyond the shadow of doubt that the accused had malicious intent.

Malicious intent is a legal notion that may affect different areas of the law, both civil law and criminal law.

When you act or do something with malicious intent or malicious intentions, you are deliberately doing something that will cause injury to another or be detrimental to them. ~ Lawyer.zone

article 126 ucmj

Two Types: Article 126

There are two types of arson:

  1. Aggravated Arson
  2. Simple Arson

With aggravated arson, it means the dwelling or structure must have humans inside or the possibility they could have been inside. Simple arson is the burning of a dwelling or structure with no humans inside.

Both types require prosecutors to prove ownership of the dwelling or structure.

Why It Can Be Difficult For Prosecutors To Prove

There are many factors that come into play in convicting a service member of an Article 126.

  1. Forensic evidence is important. The evidence must absolutely show arson was the method and that it was a willful act.
  2. What a person says can be held against them. Normally, prosecutors are able to convict just because the person stated guilt.
  3. Motives are ultra important because it must be proved the accused willfully and maliciously started the fire.

If A Person Is Found Guilty

A conviction of an Article 126 carries terrible consequences. For aggravated arson:

  • Demoted to E1
  • Loss of all pay and allowances
  • 20 years in prison
  • and a dishonorable discharge

There are two structures for simple arson:

If damage is less than $500

  • Demoted to E1
  • Loss of all pay and allowances
  • 1 year in prison
  • and a dishonorable discharge

For more than $500

  • Demoted to E1
  • Loss of all pay and allowances
  • 5 years in prison
  • and a dishonorable discharge

If You’re Accused

If you’re accused of this crime, be sure to hire proper legal guidance. Here’s what I found online (keep in mind I am not an attorney):

You don’t stand a chance in your trial unless you know what you’re up against. And you must understand before you walk into your trial that the military and its prosecutors will stop at nothing to see you convicted, dishonorably discharged, and thrown into jail. Period. We’ve seen it time and time again.

Accused service members go into their trials underprepared and underrepresented. Experienced military prosecutors run circles around these service members. If these service members had prepared beforehand and secured better representation, they may not have become a statistic in the military’s 90% conviction rate. ~ Bilecki Law Group

military arson
Final Thoughts

I really hope that no one reading this article will ever have to face an Article 126.

Please be careful when handling flammable materials. Many service members have been charged with this offense because of an accident.

While we are not attorneys, you are free to ask any questions and we will attempt to get an answer to you. If you or anyone you know is facing an Article 126, we strongly recommend you get an attorney experienced in military law.

I hope this helps you understand the UCMJ Article 126 Arson.

Please leave your comments and questions below. Thanks.

Other Posts You Might Enjoy:
  1. Article 129 UCMJ: A Brief Overview
  2. Article 131 UCMJ: A Brief Overview
  3. Article 133 UCMJ: A Brief Overview
  4. The Army Zero Tolerance Drug Policy
  5. Times When Disobeying A Direct Order Is The Right Thing To Do
Sincerely,
chuck holmes







Chuck Holmes
Former Army Major (resigned)
Publisher, Part-Time-Commander.com
Email: mrchuckholmes@gmail.com

Suggested Resources
Join Our New Facebook Group
Check Out Our Online Store
Earn Extra Money
Suggested Health Products

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.